Speed Showdown
Nginx vs LiteSpeed: Comparing Two Event-Driven Web Servers Head to Head
Both Nginx and LiteSpeed ditched Apache's one-process-per-connection model for something faster under load — the real question is what each one does with that speed once it's built in.
Event-driven
Architecture shared by both servers
HTTP/3
Native support built into LiteSpeed
Built-in
LSCache vs a manually configured FastCGI cache
$2.09/mo
Starting price for LiteSpeed-powered hosting
In short
Nginx vs LiteSpeed is a contest between two event-driven servers built to handle many concurrent connections efficiently, but they differ on caching and compatibility: Nginx needs its FastCGI cache module manually configured and invalidated, while LiteSpeed ships LSCache built in with automatic CMS-aware invalidation and native HTTP/3 support. LiteSpeed also reads Apache-style .htaccess directly, which Nginx cannot. Hosting Cheap runs LiteSpeed with LSCache on NVMe SSD from $2.09/mo.
Nginx remains a strong choice for teams that want full manual control over reverse-proxy configuration; LiteSpeed trades some of that manual control for caching and compatibility that work out of the box.
Nginx earned its reputation by solving a problem Apache struggled with: serving thousands of concurrent connections without a process or thread tied up for each one. Its event-driven, asynchronous architecture made it the default choice for high-traffic sites and reverse-proxy setups, and it remains extremely fast at what it's configured to do. The trade-off is that 'configured' is doing real work in that sentence — Nginx doesn't read .htaccess files, has no built-in full-page cache, and expects its behavior defined upfront in server blocks rather than adjusted per-directory later.
LiteSpeed took the same event-driven approach and paired it with two things Nginx leaves to the administrator: a built-in full-page cache (LSCache) with CMS-aware invalidation, and native support for Apache-style .htaccess so existing configurations carry over. Comparing the two fairly means looking past 'both are fast' and into what each one does with caching, protocol support and configuration effort.
Architecture: Both Event-Driven, Same Starting Point
Nginx and LiteSpeed both abandoned Apache's process-or-thread-per-connection model in favor of an asynchronous, event-driven core that handles many connections with a smaller pool of worker processes. On raw connection-handling architecture, they're closer to each other than either is to Apache, and both scale concurrent traffic with meaningfully lower memory overhead.
Where they diverge is what gets built on top of that shared foundation — Nginx stayed close to being a fast, minimal reverse proxy and web server that does exactly what its config says and nothing more; LiteSpeed added caching, compatibility and protocol features directly into the server itself.
Caching: FastCGI Cache Configuration vs Built-In LSCache
Nginx's FastCGI cache module can cache full pages, but getting there means writing cache-key rules, cache-bypass conditions for logged-in users or carts, and a separate mechanism — typically a plugin or manual purge command — to clear stale entries when content changes. It's capable, but it's a configuration project, not a feature you switch on.
LiteSpeed's LSCache is built in and ships with official plugins for WordPress, WooCommerce and Magento that tie cache invalidation to the actual CMS events that change content — publishing a post or updating an order status clears the relevant cache entries automatically, without a manually written purge rule.
Protocol Support: HTTP/3 and QUIC
Newer HTTP protocol versions matter for real-world speed, particularly HTTP/3's improvements to connection setup and packet loss handling on mobile networks. Nginx has added HTTP/3 support in more recent releases, but it historically lagged behind and depended on which build and modules were compiled in.
LiteSpeed built HTTP/3 and QUIC support in natively and was among the earlier production web servers to support it broadly, which matters for visitors on mobile connections where HTTP/3's handshake improvements show up as measurably faster page starts.
Configuration Effort: Server Blocks vs .htaccess
Nginx configuration lives in central server-block files, which is powerful for teams who want everything defined explicitly and version-controlled, but it also means per-directory or per-user configuration changes — the kind shared hosting customers make constantly — aren't possible the way they are with .htaccess.
LiteSpeed keeps .htaccess support alive, so a site owner can add a redirect or adjust a permission in the directory it applies to, without needing access to a central server configuration file. That difference matters more on shared and reseller hosting than it does on a single dedicated application server.
Where Hosting Cheap Lands: LiteSpeed With LSCache Included
Hosting Cheap runs LiteSpeed rather than Nginx across its plans, specifically because LSCache and .htaccess compatibility remove two of the configuration steps a fast site would otherwise need set up manually.
That's paired with pure NVMe SSD storage, so the speed comparison between Nginx and LiteSpeed shows up in your favor without you needing to hand-write cache rules or reverse-proxy configuration yourself.
- Built-in LSCache instead of a manually configured FastCGI cache module
- Native HTTP/3 and QUIC support for faster mobile page loads
- Apache-style .htaccess support for per-directory configuration changes
- Pure NVMe SSD storage paired with an event-driven server core
Why Hosting Cheap
What you get
Built-in LSCache
Full-page caching with CMS-aware invalidation, no FastCGI cache rules to write.
Native HTTP/3 support
Faster connection setup for visitors on mobile networks, without extra modules.
.htaccess compatibility
Per-directory configuration changes work without central server-block access.
Event-driven core
Handles concurrent connections efficiently, the same architectural strength Nginx is known for.
Pure NVMe SSD storage
Fast storage paired with an already fast, cache-enabled server layer.
Free managed migration
Move a site off Nginx or Apache without rebuilding its configuration by hand.
How It Works
Get set up in a few steps
Review your current caching setup
Check whether pages are cached today, and how invalidation is currently handled.
Migrate to LiteSpeed hosting
Move your site over free, keeping existing redirects and configuration intact.
Enable LSCache for your CMS
Install the LSCache plugin and confirm pages cache and invalidate correctly.
Included
Everything you need, on every plan
- Confirm whether full-page caching is built in or needs manual configuration
- Check native HTTP/3 support rather than relying on an add-on module
- Test whether .htaccess-style per-directory changes are supported
- Compare cache-invalidation behavior after publishing new content
- Measure concurrent-connection handling under real traffic, not idle benchmarks
- Check compatibility with your CMS's official caching plugin, if any
- Confirm reverse-proxy or load-balancing needs are actually required for your setup
- Weigh configuration effort against your team's server-admin experience
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Is LiteSpeed faster than Nginx?
Both use an event-driven architecture and perform similarly on raw connection handling. LiteSpeed's practical speed advantage usually comes from LSCache being built in and configured correctly by default, rather than the core server being inherently faster than a well-tuned Nginx setup.
Does Nginx support full-page caching?
Yes, via the FastCGI cache module, but it requires manually written cache-key and invalidation rules. LiteSpeed's LSCache handles the same job with CMS-specific plugins that manage invalidation automatically.
Can I use .htaccess files with Nginx?
No, Nginx doesn't read .htaccess files at all — its configuration lives centrally in server blocks. LiteSpeed reads .htaccess natively, which is one of its clearest practical differences from Nginx.
Does LiteSpeed support HTTP/3?
Yes, natively, including QUIC. Nginx has added HTTP/3 support in newer releases too, but LiteSpeed built it in earlier and more broadly across its production releases.
Which is better for a WordPress site?
LiteSpeed generally has the edge for WordPress specifically because LSCache's official WordPress plugin handles page and object caching together, whereas Nginx's FastCGI cache needs separate configuration to reach the same result.
What does Hosting Cheap run?
Hosting Cheap runs LiteSpeed with LSCache enabled across its plans, on pure NVMe SSD storage, rather than Nginx or stock Apache.
Get LiteSpeed's Caching Without the Manual Setup
Built-in LSCache, HTTP/3 and NVMe SSD — LiteSpeed hosting from $2.09/mo.
Get Started